gallery/logo
Mail Login:
Password:

Archive Siberian Research, 2019, 1, (1)  >  Historical cities of Yakutia 

Some thoughts on the disappearance of some varieties of Samoyedic

 

G.Y. Peler

ABSTRACT      

     Disappearance of some Southern Samoyedic varieties in the course of history has been attributed by some Russian and Western scholars to the assimilation of their speakers to Turkic peoples. It is a historical fact that the last speakers of some Southern Samoyedic varieties lived and died among Turkic peoples. However, the statements of these scholars seem to be superficial as they are failing to notice the historical developments, which had occurred prior to the eventual assimilation of these Samoyedic groups. This study aimed to re-evaluate these judgements in the light of historical events, which had taken place from the 17th century to the 19th century. The examination of historical records of what happened in the course of these centuries has put down to the fact contagious diseases, external and internal confrontations, migrations, alcoholism etc. had inflicted no recoverable blows to Siberian populations bringing Samoyedic groups to an irreversible point. Depredated Samoyedic populations became vulnerable and exposed to language loss and assimilation. Consequently, the last speakers of Southern Samoyedic varieties had been absorbed by their Turkic neighbours. Therefore, assimilation should be regarded as the lattermost among the factors, which caused the disappearance of Southern Samoyedic peoples and varieties.

Keywords: Samoyedic, Southern Samoyeds, assimilation, language loss, Turkicization, social dislocation, migration.

For citation: Peler G.Y. Some thoughts on the disappearance of some varieties of Samoyedic // Siberian
Research. 2019. 1 (1). P. 116 - 121. https://doi.org/10.33384/26587270.2019.01.006e


Received February 6, 2019, accepted for publication February 24, 2019, published April 1, 2019.

 

INFORMATION ABOUT AUTHOR

1. PELER Gökçe Yükselen, Erciesy University, Faculty of Letters, Department of Contemporary Turkic Languages and Literatures, Head of Department, Assoc. Prof., 38280, Kayseri, Talas, Ahmet El Biruni Caddesi No: 91, Turkey, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9604-5101, e-mail: gokceyukselen@gmail.com.

 

REFERENCES

1. Abondolo D. ed., The Uralic languages. London and New York: Routledge; 2006. 619 p.

2. Ackerman F, Salminen T. Nenets. In: Brown K, editor. Encyclopedia of language & linguistics, second edition, v. 8. Oxford: Elsevier; 2006. p. 577-579.

3. Janhunen J. Samoyedic. In: Abondolo D, editor. The Uralic languages. London and New York: Routledge; 2006. p. 457-479.

4. Suihkonen P, The Uralic languages. Fennia. 2002; 180(1-2): 165-176.

5. Janhunen J. Uralic Languages. In: Bright W, editor. International encyclopedia of linguistics, v. 4. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1992. p. 205-210.

6. Hajdu P. The Samoyed peoples and languages. Bloomington: Indiana University Publications; 1963. 114 p.

7. Gumilev L. N. (2003). Hazar çevresinde bin yıl. (trans. A. Batur). Istanbul: Selenge Yayınları; 2003. 420 p.

8. Schiefner A. ed., M. Alexander Castren’s Grammatik der Samojedischen Sprachen. St. Petersburg: Kaiserlischen Akademie der Wissenschaften; 1854. 608 p.

9. Wixman R. The peoples of the USSR. An ethnographic handbook. New York: M.E. Sharpe, Inc. Armonk, N.Y.; 1988. 230 p.

10. Krauss M. The indigenous languages of the North: A report on their present state. Northern minority languages: Problems of survival – Senri ethnological studies, 1997; 44: 1-34.

11. Lopatin IA. The extinct and near-extinct tribes of Northeastern Asia as compared with the American Indian. American antiquity. 1940; 5(3): 202-208.

12. Menges KH. The South-Siberian Turkic languages I – General characteristics of their phonology. Central Asiatic journal. 1955; 1: 107-136.

13. Menges KH. The South-Siberian Turkic languages II – Notes on the Samojed substratum”. Central Asiatic journal. 1956; 2: 161-175.

14. Menges KH. Die türkischen Sprachen Süd-Sibiriens III: Tuba (Soyon und Karagas), 1. Central Asiatic journal. 1959; 4: 90-129.

15. Potapov LP. The origin and ethnic composition of the Koybals. In: Michael HN, editor. Studies in Siberian ethnogenesis. Toronto: University of Toronto Press; 1962. p. 144-168.

16. Prokof’yeva ED. The Nentsy. In: Levin MG, Potapov LP, editors. The peoples of Siberia. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press; 1964. p. 547-570.

17. Wurm, SA. Siberia: 1650-1950 ethnic and linguistic changes. In: Wurm SA, Mühlhäuser P, Tryon D, editors. Atlas of languages of intercultural communication in the Pacific, Asia and the Americas. New York – Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter; 1996. p. 969-974.

18. Forsyth J. The peoples of Siberia. In: Doeker-Mach G, editor. The forgotten peoples of Siberia. Zurich – Berlin – New York: Scalo Publishers; 1993. p. 193-202.

19. Killi Yılmaz G. Kuzey ve Güneydoğu Sibirya Türklerinin dil durumu. Ankara: KÖKSAV; 2010. 260 p.

20. Schönig C. Güney Sibirya Türkçesi nasıl gelişmiştir? In: Gürsoy-Naskali E, editor. Sibirya araştırmaları. Istanbul: Simurg; 1997. p. 47-50.

21. Nasilov DM. Sibirya Türk hakları (etnik azınlıklar) ve dilleri. In: Gürsoy-Naskali E, editor. Sibirya araştırmaları. Istanbul: Simurg; 1997. p. 51-55.

22. Orkun HN. Türk dünyası. Istanbul: Muallim Ahmet Halit Kitaphanesi; 1932. 80 p.

23. Gürsoy-Naskali E. Sibirya deyince. In: Gürsoy-Naskali E, editor. Sibirya araştırmaları. Istanbul: Simurg; 1997b. p. 11-16.

24. Forsyth J.  A history of the peoples of Siberia - Russia’s North Asian colony 1581-1990. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2000. 455 p.

   

Download full text PDF

HUMANITARIAN RESEARCH

SECTION

 

 

LINGUISTICS